Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide are Murder :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia is Murder Euthanasia - is it killing or letting die? In the last thirty years, this has been a highly controversial topic, the worldly morals versus the Christian. Although there are certain instances where it is justifiably considered to be letting die, it is essentially murder. Euthanasia comes from a Greek word, meaning "easy death," and is now often associated with the infamous Dr. Kevorkian. There are three types of euthanasia - what doctors consider to be "letting the patient die," for instance taking both conscious and unconscious patients off of life support, not reviving the patient in case of a heart failure, et cetera. There is also assisted suicide. Dr. Kevorkian and his suicide machine have made themselves known through this technique. The machine injects a lethal dosage into the "patients" blood stream, killing then painlessly within ten minutes. The first type mentioned above is known as "active voluntary euthanasia." This is where a conscious, mentally competent person, usually with a severe physical ailment, loses the will to live. Many have said that keeping them alive is just prolonging their death, a form of cruel and unusual punishment. They may ask that life support equipment be disconnected so that they can die quickly, painlessly, with dignity. Most doctors are trained to try their best to defeat death, or at least try to delay it as long as possible. But if the patient is hopelessly ill, and would prefer to die, the doctor may consult the hospital ethics committee, and take him or her off of life support. When taken to court in these issues, the doctors defend themselves in saying, "I didn't kill him, I let him die." This is illegal throughout the United States and the rest of the world, but it still is a common occurrence. The second type, "passive voluntary euthanasia," is done when a terminally ill patient's or a patient in a persistent vegetative state's (PVS) family chooses to take their loved one off of life support. A PVS patient has no self-awareness or any awareness of their surroundings because the cerebral cortex, the thinking part of the brain, id dead. The brain stem, the part of the brain that controls the major organs of the body, still works, though.

Government Intervention: Airbus and Boeing

Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus Towards the beginning of aircraft manufacturing, Boeing and McDonnell Douglas stood as the leading aircraft manufacturers on a global scale. Working alongside the U. S. Department of Defense, Boeing received multiple contracts aiding the industry with tax breaks and infrastructure support. Meanwhile, Spain, France, Germany, and Britain formed an alliance to help start the second most leading aircraft manufacturer, Airbus. Since democratic socialism was the current system in Europe, it was customary for the government to play such a large role.Thus, Airbus received billions of Euros in subsidies and soft loans from these founding governments. Not only did their money nurture the birth of Airbus, but also helped this company to continue to succeed and compete against Boeing. In their defense, EU officials claimed that this stimulated approximately 53,000 jobs, created a large capital in Europe, and generated massive tax revenues. By the 2000 ’s, Airbus ended up exceeding Boeing’s sales, which led the United States to bring the case to the World Trade Organization.On the contrary, EU came back with a counter-claim stating that the United States had massive defense contracts with Boeing, and even an alliance with Japanese business partners such as Kawasaki and Mitsubishi. The Japanese partners, alone, funded $1. 5 billion in soft loans. The heavy subsidies and soft loans provided by the EU can be considerably unfair in the development and success of Airbus. With the support of the four countries Spain, France, Germany, and Britain, Airbus is practically incapable of failing.The main issue to be argued is not how the governments of the four founding countries helped the birth of Airbus, but how the millions of dollars in aid and â€Å"loans† are allowing Airbus to quickly gain market share and help surpass Boeing’s annual sales. Airbus has several advantages in terms of gaining such a healthy su pport from the EU governments. For example, they can cut their costs in production, and use those finances towards market research, and better understanding and mastering the market.According to BBC News Article â€Å"Europe Considers Airbus Soft Loan†, the aid helped Airbus gain the A350 aircraft at a lower price, and thus compete in the same market as Boeings 787 Dreamliner. In terms of Europe’s history of socialism, it is more acceptable for such government aid since the government plays a large role in mass transit. However, these loans and grants still cross the line, and the government has intervened too much in such a private industry. At the same time, the U. S. military contracts are equivalent to subsidiaries. Although the U. S. military has defense contracts with Boeing, they do not own Boeing.The U. S. military would not want a foreign country producing its defensive weapons. It makes sense that they would be involved in contracts with the largest global ai rcraft manufacture in the United States. It is felt by the United States government that contracts with the United States military are not the same as direct grants from the United States government. Through this arrangement, Boeing receives an unfair advantage. Over the years, Boeing has received $23 billion United States taxpayer dollars. Boeing also received infrastructure support and tax breaks from the government.In 2010, the WTO found Airbus to be illegal because they had acquired $20 million dollars in EU aid. It appears that the Americans are helping to fund Boeing, while the Europeans aid Airbus. Much like it’s French competitor, Boeing enjoys considerable benefits from the state of Washington. Boeing employs more than 80,000 people in Washington State; providing high salary, high skill jobs to Washingtonians. In order to keep the company’s headquarters in state, Washington has provided significant corporate tax breaks and infrastructure support. State tax dol lars are used to make sure doing business is easy in Washington.At this point, evaluating fairness is pure conjecture. It can be argued that the USA’s lawsuits against European subsidies provided to Airbus are hypocritical, if Washington is offering government benefits as well. Washington operates in a legal grey area when it comes to international trade. As Washington is not it’s own country, it cannot be held to World Trade Organization standards. The US government argues that the tax-breaks and infrastructure development provided by Washington State are miniscule when compared to the billions provided in subsidies and soft loans to Airbus.Washington’s tax breaks and infrastructure assistance are obviously advantageous for Boeing. Judging whether it gives Boeing an unfair competitive advantage is, again, pure conjecture. It is beneficial to recognize how small such advantages seem when compared to the billion dollar subsidies offered to Airbus and the defense contracts offered to Boeing. Airbus generates a huge amount of money and employs thousands of people in the world. Currently the European Union is supporting the company financially through multiple loans.The Airbus Company is not responsible for paying back their past debt unless they make a profit. Boeing has brought about multiple lawsuits in regard to the government support, and believes that Airbus would not be able to continue if they were not supported by the European Union. It can be suggested that the European Union will not discontinue support to Airbus because of the 53,000 people who are employed by the company. Airbus also generates a lot of money for Europe and would not only cost the jobs of 53,000 people, but also a huge market for European profits.The European Union’s support of Airbus is in its best interest of the economy for Europe. There would be a huge loss of jobs for Europe and the economy would be directly affected. The benefits from Airbus to Europe are much more valuable to them than the money they may be losing from their investment. At the same time, Boeing is also benefiting from the support of the United Nations. In recent years, the government has been supporting Boeing as means of competing with the European government support towards Airbus.In the event that the world trade organization rules against Airbus, and tells it to stop providing subsidies, Airbus will most likely find alternative ways to preserve their company. They would most likely find different ways to provide loans. They would also argue that this is what the US is doing, like the subsidies they’ve received from Japan. Maintaining the aircraft industry is very difficult because there are many expenses that go into making and conserving an aircraft. Airbus would have to seek help elsewhere to assist with the finance so that they could turn a profit while still holding up competition with Boeings newer aircraft.Although this is most likely what they would do, a new approach that could help them without using subsides is finding newer and more effective forms of technology. Inputting newer technological advances would make the Airbus airplane more desired than the Boeing airplanes. New technologies may include a fuel-efficient airplane, or an airplane built with more comfort; by making the aircraft more appealing and run cheaper, they might be able to beat out the competition of Boeing without help from the government. This approach is how Airbus can again be a leader in the global commercial aircraft industry.

Philip Zimbardo s The Lucifer Effect On Understanding...

Philip Zimbardo is one of the greatest American psychologist’s of our time. Zimbardo is an extremely intelligent psychologist with many accomplishments. He has spent most of his life committed to researching how and why people’s behavior change in situations, unexpectedly. For example, a good person committing a bad crime. Zimbardo’s research has brought a lot of knowledge to the study of psychology. His work has helped me to better understand the reasoning behind people’s behaviors and actions. One of his best accomplishments and famously known for is the Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip Zimbardo is also an amazing author of many books, including the book, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. The Lucifer Effect makes an effort to perceive the significance of how good people turn bad. The book views the lives of people who are put into difficult situations. It seeks to identify the fundamental problem the person has. The fundamental problem that seems to raise question is the distinctiveness of character transformations when put into certain situations. There are examples about character transformation all throughout the book. In the first chapter, The Rape of Rwanda shows a perfect example. It’s shocking to read how the influence of one person changed the two villages. The beliefs of that one person altered the minds of thousands. Men and women’s thoughts were changed into thinking it was ok to kill. It’s disturbing to know howShow MoreRelatedSummary : Leviathan 1156 Words   |  5 Pagespresence of adults or authority; and, thus, kids became more accustomed to anarchy. Due to this lawless environment, the evil human nature gradually overto ok Jack and his hunting group and eventually led to savagery. Although there is no reason to behave in a polite manner, Ralph suggested that they ought to have rules and let kids vote for a chief to control them (P58). Despite Jack s burning passion to win the title, Ralph was voted the chief as he was the person who created the assembly and possessedRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of The Lucifer Effect 846 Words   |  4 PagesRhetorical Analysis: The Lucifer Effect The Lucifer Effect examines how the human mind has the capacity to be infinitely caring or selfish, kind or cruel, creative or destructive. This work analyses the Stanford Prison Experiment, and the author’s personal experiences as an expert witness for one of the Abu Ghraib prison guards, to raise fundamental questions about the nature of good and evil. Mankind wants us to believe that there is a little good in all of us. Zimbardo created a min blowing experimentRead More`` The Lottery `` By Shirley Jackson894 Words   |  4 PagesAccording to Philip Zimbardo the author of The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, he says â€Å"Good people can be induced, seduced, and initiated into behaving in evil ways. They can also be led to act in irrational, stupid, self-destructive, antisocial, and mindless ways when they are immersed in total situations that impact human nature in ways that challenge our sense of the stability and consistency of individual perso nality, of character, and of morality† (Philip). In the shortRead MoreThe Stanford Prison Experiment : Research On Situational Power Essay1883 Words   |  8 PagesSocial psychologist, Philip Zimbardo, has lead one of the most infamous experiments in the modern history with the Stanford Prison Experiment. The immense popularity of the experimental research on situational power, although having cultivated great recognition, has overshadowed the multiple contributions and accomplishments that Zimbardo continues to assume in his lifetime. Many of Zimbardo’s recognitions have been brought upon due to the Stanford Prison Experiment, yet in this paper will extensivelyRead MoreOverview and Significance of Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment1825 Words   |  8 Pagesordinary people do unusual things that seem alien to their natures? Why do good people sometimes act evil? Who do smart people sometimes do dumb or irrational things? Zimbardo is one of the most significant social psychologist and all his work aims to find the answers to these questions. The purpose of this paper is to go into depth on the previous prison experiment, how it came about, and how the findings play a role in society today. The Life and Times of Zimbardo Philip George Zimbardo was bornRead MoreStanford Prisoner s Experiment And Electric Shock Experiment1120 Words   |  5 Pagesconducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at the Stanford University in 1971. He recruited some special test subjects, 24 students who were physically and mentally healthy, with high stability in their emotion. Then divided them into two groups. A group dressed as guards and others act as prisoners. The experiment was planned for fourteen days, but was abolished in the seventh day. The reason for the termination was that the experiment had caused a damage to the prisoner s both mental and health performanceRead MoreMacbeth Good Vs Evil Essay1522 Words   |  7 Pagesbetween good and evil is a conflict full of strife, where consideration of natural law is continually overshadowed by the seductive illusion of power. William Shakespeare’s 17th-century play Macbeth shows the conflict of an honourable man who is provoked by external factors to fall from go odness and execute deplorable crimes. Not only does Macbeth become evil due to his inner nature, but external factors such as pride and greed cause him to succumb to an existence of sin. The majority of people areRead MoreMajor Categories Of Social Influence : Conformity, Compliance, And Obedience2039 Words   |  9 PagesKatrina Venta PSY 226 Community College of Aurora March 11, 2016 Abstract There are three major categories of social influence: conformity, compliance, and obedience. Conformity is the change of behavior to be able to fit in and gain approval from other people. Compliance, on the other hand, is when a person changes their behavior in response to being asked directly. While obedience is a response to an authority figure directing an individual (Kenrick, Neuberg, Cialdini, 2010, p. 183). These social influencesRead MoreCritique the Power of Organizations from Weberian and Goffmanesque Perspective in the Stanford Prison Experiment1780 Words   |  8 Pagesofficials following rules and supervised by officials in a higher office under the enforcement of legal authority. Goffman’s research on mental patients in ‘Asylums’ is at the forefront of understanding ‘total institutions’. His research gives us an insight into the world of the inmate, thus gaining an understanding of the ‘structure of the self’ and ‘mortification of the self’ in an institutional setting (1959 Goffman). Goffman identified that individuals ‘perform’ social roles, suggesting we areRead MoreEthics Of The Medical Waste Management1496 Words   |  6 Pagest your concern. Considering her situation, Chantale need keep her job and still has faith in management, so brings this matter to us. Ethical behave and cost controlling are always the issue question our mind. Initially the hospital seeks to be a good corporate citizen and therefore chose Cleanco for the contract as Cleanco has a reputation for disposing of waste in an environmentally responsible manner. As the Medical Waste Management, Cleanco choose a local municipal landfill instead of professional